Due to the correlations discovered, one or two multiple regressions was basically did understand hence parameters might be regarded as predictor details out of PCM and NCM in the present shot ( Table 3).
The partnership ranging from childbirth motivations with fertility preferences and you may genuine youngster amount in reproductive-many years women in Mashhad, Iran
New patterns displayed for the Table 3 was basically statistically extreme and said 24% of one’s complete difference regarding PCM and you can 10% out-of NCM. 7 of your own fourteen parameters examined shown themselves while the high predictors out-of PCM. thirty two, ? = -.twenty-two and you can ? = .17, correspondingly. Regarding the NCM, simply four of twelve parameters interviewed exhibited themselves as predictor details. The newest variables which have or perhaps not which have youngsters (? = .17), age (? = .14), religiosity (? = -.12) and you will sex (? = .10) showed stronger relationships on the NCM.
The outcome indicate a media bad matchmaking ranging from both constructs; ergo, high degrees of PCM is on the low levels out-of NCM and vice-versa
Correlations have been located anywhere between PCM, NCM together with twelve parameters checked out; also, eight variables have been seen to be predictors out of PCM and you can five was predictors of NCM, corroborating Miller’s offer you to definitely refers to CM as the constructs which can be influenced by numerous individual and you may contextual details ( Miller, Pasta, MacMurray, Muhleman, & Comings, 2000 Miller, W. Sayfaya Git New parameters: religiosity, that have or otherwise not which have children, and many years demonstrated healthier relationship with PCM, obtaining coefficients away from ? =